| |
 n
my conversation with Hank Hanegraaff, he basically said that no one in
the history of the world has lived even a day without sin. I said that
was not necessarily true, and quoted Job 1:8. There was immediately a
lot of intensity in Hanks voice as he denied this biblical truth. The
obvious reason why Hank became so agitated is because in his Book Christianity
in Crisis (chapter 8), he actually defends Job, The Faith teachers
had accused Job of sin, because he didn't fit with their theology. As
Part of Hank's defence, he states:
"When forced to see that no less an authority than God Almighty says
Job was upright and blameless, Copeland claims God was merely making
a positive confession. If this were true, God would not only be a deceiver,
but he would also be self-deluded."(1)
Obviously, Hank is
wrong in one of these views. The question is, which one-and will he admit
it? In his book he defended Job against those who would
accuse him of sin but, when talking to me he himself accused Job of sin.
The Faith teachers had accused Job of sin, but Hank said no Job was blameless.
Then at another time he accuses everyone of sin, and makes the comment
that "blameless" doesn't mean that he never sinned. Hank may be inconsistent,
but fortunately the language of the Bible in this regard is plain.
While I would not
say that Job had never sinned, I would assert that he was blameless for
some unspecified period of time. Hank was right when he stated
that Job was blameless, this proves that suffering is
not necessarily a result of sin despite the accusation of Job's "friends."
Satan had accused Job of serving God for selfish reasons. He taunted God
by saying that if He would stretch his hand out against Job, Job would
surely curse him. Job never did. Yes, he did end up repenting of things
he said in the course of the trial, but at the beginning he was still
blameless and in the end he was restored.
Hank's response to
me seemed to assume that if he could demonstrate that Job had committed
a sin at any time it would destroy my position. This is not the case,
Job might have committed many sins in his life; he was not "sinless."
However his conduct was blameless for a period of time.
There are two things
that we can learn from Job. First of all, he is an example of one who
didn't sin everyday, and this despite the fact that Hank believes this
feat to be impossible. Furthermore, the sin he did commit was very specific:
he obscured "God's counsel." This seems to be Hank's conclusion:
Job sinned-I have to sin. If this proves that we have to sin then
it would also prove that we have to obscure God's counsel. Noah's sin
would prove we have to get drunk, and David's sin would prove that we
have to commit adultery and murder.
I acknowledge that
in the course of his trial, Job did sin. The question is, why did God
record this? Hank would say God recorded this to show that we have to
sin. He would imply that, if Job did, obviously we have to. However the
bible says that God recorded it so that we could learn from it: that we
could learn what we should and should not do. I would choose this position
because it is consistent with the Bible while Hanks is not. 1 Corinthians
10 states that God recorded the sins and judgments of those in the Old
Testament as examples for us of what not to do. We can also
further note that in context Paul was careful to note that God will always
provide a way of escape in our temptations.
"For I do not want you to be ignorant of the fact, brothers, that
our forefathers were all under the cloud, and that they all passed through
the sea. They were all baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea.
They all ate the same spiritual food and drank the same spiritual drink;
for they drank from the spiritual rock that accompanied them, and that
rock was Christ. Nevertheless, God was not pleased with most of them;
their bodies were scattered over the desert. Now these things
occurred as examples to keep us from setting our hearts on evil things
as they did. Do not be idolaters, as some of them were;
as it is written: 'The people sat down to eat and drink and got up to
indulge in pagan revelry.' We should not commit sexual immorality, as
some of them did-and in one day twenty-three thousand of them died.
We should not test the Lord, as some of them did-and were killed by
snakes. And do not grumble, as some of them did-and were killed by the
destroying angel. These things happened to them as examples and were
written down as warnings for us, on whom the fulfillment of the ages
has come. So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that
you don't fall! No temptation has seized you except what is common to
man. And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond what
you can bear. But when you are tempted, he will also provide a way out
so that you can stand up under it."
(1 Cor 10:1-13 emphasis added)
The question is
who will you follow? Will you follow the example of wickedness shown in
the desert, the example of theological confusion in Job, or the example
of Christ in the righteousness by which he has redeemed us. God recorded these
sins for a redemptive purpose, but unfortunately some use it for a destructive
purpose.
You Can't Have It Both Ways.
In my conversation
with Hank, he was being completely inconsistent with his own published
statements. I encourage you to look at chapter eight in his book wherein
he defends Job very eloquently. It is unfortunate to see that Hank himself
is willing to distort the scriptures when convenient. This is nowhere
more plain then here. The fact that Job obscured God's counsel is no excuse
for Hank to do the same. In writing this, I fear that the Faith Teachers
could misuse this information; but we are each responsible only for ourselves.
If someone loves truth they won't misuse it, they will find it.
1. Hank Hanegraaff,
Christianity in Crisis, (Eugene, Oregon: Harvest House, 1993),
263. See also the Crisis
tapes.
|

"He still maintains his integrity, though you incited me against
him to ruin him without any reason." Job 2:3b
Job Defended
Real player
Windows Media
Job Accused
Real player
Windows Media

"[You asked,] `Who is this that obscures my counsel without knowledge?'
Surely I spoke of things I did not understand, things too wonderful for
me to know. ["You said,] `Listen now, and I will speak; I will question
you, and you shall answer me.' My ears had heard of you, but now my eyes
have seen you. Therefore, I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes."
Job 42:3-6


|